Safari 4: Initial Reactions

One of my desktop wallpapers is centered around a quote from Jeffrey Zeldman: “To Hell With Bad Browsers”. I couldn’t agree more; a good browser is the first line of defense against a negative online experience. In the past year, we’ve been faced with a number of browsers to validate – Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, and a few others like Lunascape and Flock.

Notice that I didn’t include Internet Explorer in that list.

Browser Benchmarks

Browser Benchmarks

Upon Tuesday’s beta release of Safari 4, I was excited to see what Apple had to bring to the table. On the performance side, I couldn’t be happier with the result. It was benchmarked by CNET, and was found to be the the top performer against Minefield, Chrome, Firefox, Opera, and Internet Explorer. Like its predecessor, it also passed Acid3 testing. I could really feel the speed difference when browsing – there was virtually no wait time to load a page, even over WiFi. Doesn’t get much better than that.

Aesthetics is nice, but I don

The aesthetics are nice, but I don't see myself using Top Sites too often.

I wasn’t a huge fan of the UI changes, though. From your average end-user’s perspective, Top Sites and Cover Flow does accomplish its aim: a simple, graphical representation of web activity. But as a power user, I’m all about functionality. I don’t really need to see a 3-D panorama of the sites I visit most; I know what sites do it for me. Although, looking at Apple’s Safari page does make me consider reverting my opinion, because, yes – it does look cool.

But the two biggest issues with the UI lie in tabs and the address bar.

Tabs on Top isn’t an awful concept, but the implementation is somewhat lacking. The furthermost left tab doesn’t blend well with the rest of the window and looks very rough. Note that Apple does not show this left tab on their site.

Not a very clean look.

Not an overly clean look.

I’d also like to see the return of the classic “address/loading bar in one”. While Apple’s angle might be that Safari doesn’t have a long enough loading time to justify a progress indicator, Cupertino can’t control every individual’s connection, and therefore the experience will differ.

The good news is that there’s some fixes for those of us who want to tweak the settings a bit. For Mac OS X, you can install a ZIP from this site and configure features directly from Safari’s application menu. On Windows, just open up com.apple.Safari.plist (located in C:\Documents and Settings\User\Application Data\Apple Computer\Preferences), and change the YES or NO located next to these strings:

DebugSafari4TabBarIsOnTop

DebugSafari4IncludeToolbarRedesign

DebugSafari4IncludeGoogleSuggest

DebugSafari4IncludeFancyURLCompletionList

DebugSafari4IncludeTopSites

DebugSafari4LoadProgressStyle

DebugSafari4IncludeFlowViewInBookmarksView

Despite a few quirks, I was quite pleased with Safari 4. Keep in mind that this is still a beta, and that revisions are forthcoming.  I’ll be interested to see the final release; hopefully the small things that hold it back from perfection will be resolved.

Tags: , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Safari 4: Initial Reactions”

  1. How to Get Six Pack FastNo Gravatar Says:

    If you ever want to read a reader’s feedback :) , I rate this post for 4/5. Decent info, but I have to go to that damn google to find the missed bits. Thanks, anyway!

  2. Matt SmithNo Gravatar Says:

    Thanks for reading :)

  3. PaulNo Gravatar Says:

    Apple Safari takes more resources compared to Opera and Firefox. sometimes it also freezes so i would still stick to Opera.

  4. KhimNo Gravatar Says:

    i like the design of Safari 4 but i think it uses more resources compared to Opera.

  5. melatoninplusNo Gravatar Says:

    Safari 4 is a bit slow compared to either Opera and Firefox. but i like the interface and graphics of Safari 4, it is cool though.

  6. SunmiNo Gravatar Says:

    i really love the layout of Safari 4. the graphics of this browser looks much better than firefox.

Leave a Reply