<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter vs. RSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themattsmith.net/2009/09/twitter-vs-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themattsmith.net/2009/09/twitter-vs-rss/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vs</title>
		<link>http://www.themattsmith.net/2009/09/twitter-vs-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>vs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themattsmith.net/?p=135#comment-109</guid>
		<description>i think that you can&#039;t compare between the two Twitter and RSS because it&#039;s two different technologies that not related to each other but you can compare for example Twitter vs. Google Buzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that you can&#8217;t compare between the two Twitter and RSS because it&#8217;s two different technologies that not related to each other but you can compare for example Twitter vs. Google Buzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Goleman</title>
		<link>http://www.themattsmith.net/2009/09/twitter-vs-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Goleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themattsmith.net/?p=135#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. I don&#039;t think Twitter is the death of RSS. RSS is very much alive and well, and I agree with Jonathan that Twitter cant&#039; give you the full story. I think there maybe a time when another social media tool may incorporate RSS and make it obsolete but not in the immediate future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. I don&#8217;t think Twitter is the death of RSS. RSS is very much alive and well, and I agree with Jonathan that Twitter cant&#8217; give you the full story. I think there maybe a time when another social media tool may incorporate RSS and make it obsolete but not in the immediate future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Splitlog</title>
		<link>http://www.themattsmith.net/2009/09/twitter-vs-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Splitlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themattsmith.net/?p=135#comment-61</guid>
		<description>The reason Twitter could never replace RSS for me is the fact that it can&#039;t deliver the whole story to me in one place.  It only gives me a link to the site.  It&#039;s like you expect a newspaper delivery and all the person delivers is a map to get to where the news is being distributed.  RSS is a central hub where I know whether or not I want to read the article by glancing at it, no clicking through 200+ links a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Twitter could never replace RSS for me is the fact that it can&#8217;t deliver the whole story to me in one place.  It only gives me a link to the site.  It&#8217;s like you expect a newspaper delivery and all the person delivers is a map to get to where the news is being distributed.  RSS is a central hub where I know whether or not I want to read the article by glancing at it, no clicking through 200+ links a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.themattsmith.net/2009/09/twitter-vs-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themattsmith.net/?p=135#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback. I do disagree with the article, but I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s flat-out wrong. Just a difference of opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback. I do disagree with the article, but I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s flat-out wrong. Just a difference of opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.themattsmith.net/2009/09/twitter-vs-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themattsmith.net/?p=135#comment-59</guid>
		<description>This doesn&#039;t compare Twitter to RSS it just talks about how you think the TechCrunch article is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t compare Twitter to RSS it just talks about how you think the TechCrunch article is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
